Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the megamenu-pro domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/ee016700/presmerovanie/web/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: _load_textdomain_just_in_time bola volaná nesprávne. Načítanie prekladu pre doménu interface bolo spustené príliš skoro. Toto je zvyčajne indikátor toho, že nejaký kód v plugine alebo téme sa vykonáva príliš skoro. Preklady by sa mali načítať pri akcii init alebo neskôr. Prosím pozrite si Debugovanie vo WordPress pre viac informácií. (Táto správa bola pridaná vo verzii 6.7.0.) in /home/ee016700/presmerovanie/web/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
More progress needed to replace animal tests under EU chemicals laws - Ekotox Centers

More progress needed to replace animal tests under EU chemicals laws

More progress needed to replace animal tests under EU chemicals laws

[frontpage_news widget=“838″ name=“More progress needed to replace animal tests under EU chemicals laws“]

ECHA’s report states there is progress regarding alternatives to animal testing on the lower tier properties of substances, but a full replacement of chemical toxicity testing by non-animal approaches is not yet foreseeable. Further dialogue between research and regulatory communities is needed to put scientific developments faster to regulatory use.

Helsinki, 22 November 2017 – The report on the regulatory applicability of non-animal approaches reviews their current status under the three EU chemicals regulations coordinated by ECHA (REACH, CLP and BPR). It states there have been significant scientific developments in the past 10 years regarding the replacement of animal testing for chemical safety assessment with non-animal approaches. Concepts such as the integrated approach to testing and assessment and the adverse outcome pathways now enable a better use of data from non-animal approaches. This has already reduced the need for animal testing.


For lower tier endpoints such as skin corrosion/irritation, serious eye damage/eye irritation and skin sensitisation, companies already use in vitro tests as the default method. But for more complex endpoints, for example repeated dose toxicity or reproductive toxicity, non-animal approaches are not yet foreseeable. Methods such as grouping and read-across or weight of evidence use existing test data to predict toxicity of substances and can therefore reduce the need for new tests on animals. These alternative methods can be supported by in vitro tests and in silico predictions.

New approaches, such as in vitro microsystems and high-throughput/high-content methods, are under development. They aim to provide better insight into the mechanisms of toxicity. However, they require further standardisation and validation before they can be accepted for regulatory use. A continuous dialogue between researchers and regulatory authorities is necessary to ensure that innovations in non-animal approaches to chemical safety assessment can be considered for regulatory use without undue delay. An inventory of non-animal approaches at different stages of development and regulatory applicability would help to identify current gaps and determine future steps to enhance their use.
ECHA encourages industry to use reliable non-animal approaches to adequately comply with the information obligations of the regulations. To support this, ECHA provides tools and advice through updated guidance, practical guides, IT tools, case studies and webinars.

Further info
https://echa.europa.eu/sk/-/more-progress-needed-to-replace-animal-tests-under-eu-chemicals-laws


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/ee016700/presmerovanie/web/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5471